The practise of developing automated testing without writing a single line of code is known as codeless automation. There are many codeless test automation products driven by AI on the market. Automation is the way of the future in the digital age, yet no matter what technology you use, it will never be possible to automate everything. By adopting codeless test automation, the gap between a "SDET" and a "True Tester" can be narrowed. A SDET Course can function well as a "True Tester" and codeless automation requires less work.
SDET
More SDETs (also known as "Software Development Engineer in Test"), or Java, Python, and C# programmers, make up the tester generation of today. Their programming abilities are strong, but they lack testing and quality concepts. Companies are also looking for SDETs who can create simple programmes. As a result, they skimp on testing expertise and product quality. They no longer concentrate on the functional notions but rather exclusively on issues like coding, automation, algorithms, and code complexity. Due to the fact that the automation code is ineffective and frequently fails, SDETs lack the fundamental testing competencies such as test conditions and levels of test coverage.
Real Tester
A genuine tester is someone who can comprehend business needs, clarify ambiguous requirements, develop E2E scenarios intended to detect system defects, develop test designs with positive/negative validation, and discover high-quality bugs. But most significantly, a tester needs to have end-user or customer perspective. He or she makes sure that the fundamentals of test design are upheld, that maximum test coverage is obtained, and that strong domain expertise and E2E SIT (system integration testing) abilities are provided. A manual or functional tester who can identify the scope that can be automated is known as a "True Tester."
Ways to close the gap
Future of automation = Manual QA + SDET (Codeless Automation)
Combining manual and codeless automation to revolutionise QA testing appears to hold promise in the rapidly evolving IT and digital markets. Designing and validating manual tests are part of manual quality assurance. The same person can also perform automation testing because just functional abilities and domain knowledge are needed; coding knowledge is not. By adopting the mindset of a manual tester, QA can increase the coverage of automated tests. minimise the distance between Manual QA & SDET Training as a result.
The benefits of codeless automation
Easy test automation - Simple creation and execution of automated UI, web, and mobile application scripts from manual test cases. Since they don't need considerable training for a codeless tool, manual QA may perform test automation. One person can perform both manual and automated testing.
· No object or code maintenance One of the most difficult aspects of test automation is maintaining the test code that was created for the automation in any tool that is coded.
· Automate the proper test in less time - Agile or project development sometimes involves changing requirements. As it takes less time to build, saves time, and reduces execution time by running tests in parallel, testers make the effort to design the proper test in a codeless automation tool.
· Inexpensive - Since any team member may automate processes, no more resources need to be hired. As a result, codeless automated testing requires fewer resources to manage.
· It moves 6x more quickly than scripted automation. Testing with codeless automation is 6 times faster than testing using code since QA can record and replay E2E and regression test scenarios. QA must run test cases in a variety of operating systems, devices, and versions while conducting mobile testing. Tools without code can run the test cases considerably more quickly than tools with code.
· Improved Quality: Tools for codeless automation concentrate on software quality and debugging rather than handling large amounts of code. Businesses don't cut corners on quality since it produces greater results.
· Advanced reporting - Codeless automation technologies are strong, customizable, and have the ability to provide advanced reporting, making it simpler for stakeholders to comprehend the test progress and reports.
Despite the fact that codeless automation has many wonderful benefits, there are a few myths that give it a "poor rap."
Why choose a technology for code-free test automation?
· No need to install complicated software or libraries because the software is pre-packaged
· simple cooperation
· Wrapper for Selenium and Appium powered by AI
· Saves money and time and requires no maintenance
· Parallel processing
· Integrating GitHub
· Cloud test deployment that is automated
· Plan your testing to coincide with agile release cycles
· Supports mobile apps (Android/IOS) testing, cross-browser testing, API testing, and web testing
· Excellent representation of test execution and status in the report's graphics
· Execute remotely
· Support for BDD and sophisticated scripting capabilities
· Assistance with data-driven testing
· Integration with Sauce Labs, Jenkins, and BrowserStack
· Supports emulators and lab testing for mobile devices
· Appropriate for agile testing
· Capable of managing a sizable data set and supporting different data sources
Conclusion
Without wasting time on sophisticated scenario test writing, a tester can begin test automation as soon as the UI design is complete. This makes it simple to align continuous integration with the development life cycle.
A codeless automation tool interacts with bug tracking, test management, and AI-powered features, is dependable and robust, and operates on the record-play principle. Additionally, it is affordable, requires no code maintenance, and supports cloud infrastructure. It's the greatest option for agile and DevOps release cycles that need to be speedier.
In terms of product quality, codeless automation performs better than coded automation since it narrows the distance between a "SDET" and a "True tester" and enables customers to obtain greater product quality coverage.
Comments